The Hacken 2025 Yearly Security ReportCovers major Web3 breaches, their root causes, prevention insights, and key regulatory trends for 2026.
Learn more

Cybersecurity Advisory Service

A dedicated Security Advisor embeds with your team early to guide high-risk decisions, keep delivery moving, and reduce risk across smart contracts, dApps, layer-1, and supporting infrastructure — without slowing your roadmap.

Cybersecurity Advisory

Trusted by Web3 leaders, enterprises, and governments since 2017

Logo 1Logo 2Logo 3Logo 4Logo 5Logo 6Logo 7Logo 8
1671
public security assessments completed
3084
critical-to-medium vulnerabilities prevented
$430B+
verified across PoR audits
ISO 27001
certified

Embedded security that keeps pace with your roadmap

Here's what "embedded" means in day-to-day work with your team:

Channel

A shared channel with your team (Slack/Discord) + a single accountable owner

Design reviews

Design reviews for high-risk changes (not a random ticket queue)

Threat model

A living threat model + risk register tied to sprint tickets and acceptance criteria

Ship/no-ship gates

Short ship/no-ship gates before audits, launches, and high-risk on-chain changes

Built for mid-stage teams shipping at scale

Protocol teams, exchanges, wallets, L1/L2 foundations, and Web3 product companies that need security to keep pace with delivery – not slow it down.

BannerBest fit if: you ship regularly, have a launch/upgrade coming up, and want security to own gates + retests.

You'll like this if:

You've done audits before – and want to address risk during development, not at the end

You want security work attached to sprints, milestones, and owners

You need someone to own gates, not just deliver a PDF

Not advice. Shipping artifacts your team can reuse.

You'll end up with a security capability that stays after the engagement:

  • 1-page Gate Report: ship/no-ship decision, required evidence, open risks, and sign-offs
  • Clear acceptance criteria for audit findings + retest pass conditions
  • Regression checklist for "don't repeat this class of bug"
Shipping artifacts

Outcomes you can count on

Fewer audit loops and cleaner retests

Fewer audit loops and cleaner retests (pre-audit readiness, clear acceptance criteria, regression closure)

Launch and upgrade confidence

Launch and upgrade confidence with short, evidence-based ship / no-ship gates

Reduced "escaped bugs" after launch

Reduced "escaped bugs" after launch through executable checks and monitoring

Faster incident response

Faster incident response with runbooks + drills (lower time-to-mitigate)

Security that scales with delivery

Security that scales with delivery : work attached to sprints, milestones, and owners

KPIs we track:

risk burn-downescaped-bug rate after launchtime-to-mitigate during drillsretest pass ratereduction in repeat defect classes

How the engagement works

You get one embedded Security Advisor who alternates between technical guidance and review, program management, and stakeholder comms.

When external audits or pentests are required, your architect scopes and coordinates them end-to-end while remaining the single accountable owner for outcomes, retests, and regression closure.

Planning a launch or upgrade in the next 90 days?

We'll define the gates, evidence, and security ownership to ship with confidence.

Why teams choose this program

Dedicated advisor

A single accountable point of contact throughout the engagement

Threat-led, evidence-driven

Properties, fuzzing, proofs where feasible, and archived artifacts

Transparent comms

Secure shared channel + regular progress reports

Launch-safe

Time-boxed reviews aligned to your release windows

Regulatory-aware

Security mapped to OWASP/NIST, GDPR/CCPA, MiCA/DORA/VARA, CCSS, ISO 27001

Actionable skill-up

Workshops and fix clinics so improvements stick

Yield Risk Score

Where we plug in (by surface)

Most teams start with smart contracts + upgrade governance, then expand into dApp/backend and incident readiness.

Smart Contracts

Protocol & token designUpgradeability & governanceRoles/permissionsCritical invariantsTesting strategyOn-chain monitoringEmergency procedures

dApp & Backend

dApp & BackendAuthentication & authorizationCustody flowsAPI securitySession & token lifecyclesWallet integrationsAbuse/bot defensesSecrets managementCI/CD & supply-chain hardening

Layer-1 / Node

Layer-1 / NodeConsensus & node designValidator / key ceremoniesRPC exposureObservabilityGovernance & parameter-change safety

Pentest Orchestration

Method & scope designData seedingSuccess criteriaFinding lifecycleRetesting & regression

Security Operations (SecOps & Compliance Ops)

Joiner–mover–leaver (access changes)Privileged access management (PAM) & MFA / hardware keys (FIDO2)Secrets lifecycle (HSM/MPC/rotation)SDLC controls (SAST, dependency scanning, secrets scanning, SBOM, signed builds)Incident & DR playbooks with drills

FAQs

Tell us what you're launching and when

We'll propose the right tier, the gates you'll need, and the artifacts to ship with confidence.