Q1 2025 Web3 Security ReportAccess control failures led to $1.63 billion in losses
Discover report insights
  • Hacken
  • Audits
  • rwa-inc
  • [SCA] RWA / Token / May2024
RWA.Inc logo

RWA.Inc

Audit name:

[SCA] RWA / Token / May2024

Date:

Jun 6, 2024

Table of Content

Introduction
Audit Summary
System Overview
Risks
Findings
Appendix 1. Severity Definitions
Appendix 2. Scope
Disclaimer

Want a comprehensive audit report like this?

Introduction

We express our gratitude to the RWA.Inc team for the collaborative engagement that enabled the execution of this Smart Contract Security Assessment.

RWA.inc offers Real World Asset Tokenization, giving investors the chance to invest in fractions of various Real World Assets.

Document

NameSmart Contract Code Review and Security Analysis Report for RWA.Inc
Audited ByPhilipp Eder
Approved ByYves Toiser
Websitehttps://rwa.inc
Changelog03/06/2024 - Preliminary Report
PlatformEVM
LanguageSolidity
TagsERC20, RWA
Methodologyhttps://hackenio.cc/sc_methodology
  • Document

    Name
    Smart Contract Code Review and Security Analysis Report for RWA.Inc
    Audited By
    Philipp Eder
    Approved By
    Yves Toiser
    Changelog
    03/06/2024 - Preliminary Report
    Platform
    EVM
    Language
    Solidity
    Tags
    ERC20, RWA

Review Scope

Repositoryhttps://github.com/Decubate-com/smart-contracts
Commit98302f9

Audit Summary

0Total Findings
0Resolved
0Accepted
0Mitigated

The system users should acknowledge all the risks summed up in the risks section of the report

Documentation quality

  • Functional and technical documentation is sufficient.

Code quality

  • The development environment is configured.

  • No code quality issues detected.

Test coverage

Code coverage of the project is 0% (branch coverage).

  • Tests are not mandatory for projects with less than 250 LoC.

System Overview

RWA.inc is a real world asset tokenization project with the following contracts submitted for audit:

RWAToken - burnable ERC20 token that mints the entire supply to the deployer. Additional minting is not allowed.

It has the following attributes:

  • Name: RWA Token

  • Symbol: RWA

  • Decimals: 18

  • Total Supply: 1 Billion tokens

Risks

All tokens are minted to a single address upon deployment. The security of the tokens depends on the owner of the address.

Findings

no findingsNo vulnerabilities were found

Identify vulnerabilities in your smart contracts.

Appendix 1. Severity Definitions

When auditing smart contracts, Hacken is using a risk-based approach that considers Likelihood, Impact, Exploitability and Complexity metrics to evaluate findings and score severities.

Reference on how risk scoring is done is available through the repository in our Github organization:

Severity

Description

Critical
Critical vulnerabilities are usually straightforward to exploit and can lead to the loss of user funds or contract state manipulation.

High
High vulnerabilities are usually harder to exploit, requiring specific conditions, or have a more limited scope, but can still lead to the loss of user funds or contract state manipulation.

Medium
Medium vulnerabilities are usually limited to state manipulations and, in most cases, cannot lead to asset loss. Contradictions and requirements violations. Major deviations from best practices are also in this category.

Low
Major deviations from best practices or major Gas inefficiency. These issues will not have a significant impact on code execution, do not affect security score but can affect code quality score.
  • Severity

    Critical

    Description

    Critical vulnerabilities are usually straightforward to exploit and can lead to the loss of user funds or contract state manipulation.

    Severity

    High

    Description

    High vulnerabilities are usually harder to exploit, requiring specific conditions, or have a more limited scope, but can still lead to the loss of user funds or contract state manipulation.

    Severity

    Medium

    Description

    Medium vulnerabilities are usually limited to state manipulations and, in most cases, cannot lead to asset loss. Contradictions and requirements violations. Major deviations from best practices are also in this category.

    Severity

    Low

    Description

    Major deviations from best practices or major Gas inefficiency. These issues will not have a significant impact on code execution, do not affect security score but can affect code quality score.

Appendix 2. Scope

The scope of the project includes the following smart contracts from the provided repository:

Scope Details

Repositoryhttps://github.com/Decubate-com/smart-contracts
Commit98302f9961f2147064b108f8226f3b3e1da7b5b1
Whitepaper-
Requirements-
Technical Requirements-

Contracts in Scope

contracts
RWAToken.sol - contracts/RWAToken.sol

Disclaimer