Q1 2025 Web3 Security ReportAccess control failures led to $1.63 billion in losses
Discover report insights
  • Hacken
  • Audits
  • openfabric-ai
  • [SCA] Openfabric AI / ERC20 / Aug2023
Openfabric AI logo

Openfabric AI

Audit name:

[SCA] Openfabric AI / ERC20 / Aug2023

Date:

Aug 19, 2023

Table of Content

Introduction
Audit Summary
Document Information
System Overview
Executive Summary
Risks
Findings
Appendix 1. Severity Definitions
Appendix 2. Scope
Disclaimer

Want a comprehensive audit report like this?

Introduction

We express our gratitude to the Openfabric AI team for the collaborative engagement that enabled the execution of this Smart Contract Security Assessment.

The Openfabric platform abstracts the technical complexity of AI systems, providing an enhanced user experience and business integration.

titlecontent
PlatformBNB Chain, Others
LanguageSolidity
TagsERC20
Timeline07/08/2023 -
Methodologyhttps://hackenio.cc/sc_methodology

    Review Scope

    Repositoryhttps://github.com/Openfabric/openfabric-token
    Commit0c6fa0da34fd8200e3357822a2c820f0f773b0b1

    Audit Summary

    Total10/10
    Security Score

    10/10

    Test Coverage

    0%

    Code Quality Score

    10/10

    Documentation Quality Score

    10/10

    4Total Findings
    4Resolved
    0Accepted
    0Mitigated

    The system users should acknowledge all the risks summed up in the risks section of the report

    Document Information

    This report may contain confidential information about IT systems and the intellectual property of the Customer, as well as information about potential vulnerabilities and methods of their exploitation.

    The report can be disclosed publicly after prior consent by another Party. Any subsequent publication of this report shall be without mandatory consent.

    Document

    NameSmart Contract Code Review and Security Analysis Report for Openfabric AI
    Audited ByHacken
    Websitehttps://openfabric.ai
    Changelog15/08/2023 – Initial Review
    18/08/2023 – Second Review
    • Document

      Name
      Smart Contract Code Review and Security Analysis Report for Openfabric AI
      Audited By
      Hacken
      Changelog
      15/08/2023 – Initial Review
      18/08/2023 – Second Review

    System Overview

    Openfabric AI is a token with the following contracts:

    \-OpenfabricToken — simple ERC-20 token that mints all initial supply to a deployer. Additional minting is not allowed. It has the following attributes:

    • Name: Openfabric.

    • Symbol: OFN.

    • Decimals: 18.

    • Total supply: 500m tokens.

    Privileged roles

    • OpenfabricToken.sol has no privileged roles.

    Executive Summary

    Documentation quality

    The total Documentation quality score is 10 out of 10.

    • Functional requirements are provided.

    • The technical description is provided.

    Code quality

    The total Code quality score is 10 out of 10.

    Test coverage

    Code coverage of the project is 0% (branch coverage).

    • For a project with less than 250 LOC (Lines of Code) the test coverage is not mandatory, and it is not accounted for in the final score.

    Security score

    Upon auditing, the code was found to contain 0 critical, 0 high, 0 medium, and 3 low severity issues. Out of these, 3 issues have been addressed and resolved, leading to a security score of 10 out of 10.

    All identified issues are detailed in the “Findings” section of this report.

    Summary

    The comprehensive audit of the customer's smart contract yields an overall score of 10. This score reflects the combined evaluation of documentation, code quality, test coverage, and security aspects of the project.

    Risks

    All tokens are minted to a single address. The secureness of the supply depends on the secureness of key storage.

    The documentation states that some of the token use cases are voting, staking, and rewards. Since the single address is in charge of the whole totalSupply, it creates a centralization risk.

    Findings

    Code
    Title
    Status
    Severity
    F-2023-163Unused Inheritance
    fixed

    Low
    F-2023-163Redundant Import
    fixed

    Low
    F-2023-1637Floating Pragma
    fixed

    Low
    I-2023-0424Disabled Solidity Optimizer
    fixed

    Observation
    1-4 of 4 findings

    Identify vulnerabilities in your smart contracts.

    Appendix 1. Severity Definitions

    When auditing smart contracts, Hacken is using a risk-based approach that considers Likelihood, Impact, Exploitability and Complexity metrics to evaluate findings and score severities.

    Reference on how risk scoring is done is available through the repository in our Github organization:

    Severity

    Description

    Critical
    Critical vulnerabilities are usually straightforward to exploit and can lead to the loss of user funds or contract state manipulation.

    High
    High vulnerabilities are usually harder to exploit, requiring specific conditions, or have a more limited scope, but can still lead to the loss of user funds or contract state manipulation.

    Medium
    Medium vulnerabilities are usually limited to state manipulations and, in most cases, cannot lead to asset loss. Contradictions and requirements violations. Major deviations from best practices are also in this category.

    Low
    Major deviations from best practices or major Gas inefficiency. These issues will not have a significant impact on code execution, do not affect security score but can affect code quality score.
    • Severity

      Critical

      Description

      Critical vulnerabilities are usually straightforward to exploit and can lead to the loss of user funds or contract state manipulation.

      Severity

      High

      Description

      High vulnerabilities are usually harder to exploit, requiring specific conditions, or have a more limited scope, but can still lead to the loss of user funds or contract state manipulation.

      Severity

      Medium

      Description

      Medium vulnerabilities are usually limited to state manipulations and, in most cases, cannot lead to asset loss. Contradictions and requirements violations. Major deviations from best practices are also in this category.

      Severity

      Low

      Description

      Major deviations from best practices or major Gas inefficiency. These issues will not have a significant impact on code execution, do not affect security score but can affect code quality score.

    Appendix 2. Scope

    The scope of the project includes the following smart contracts from the provided repository:

    Scope Details

    Repositoryhttps://github.com/Openfabric/openfabric-token
    Commit0c6fa0da34fd8200e3357822a2c820f0f773b0b1
    WhitepaperProvided
    RequirementsProvided
    Technical RequirementsProvided

    Contracts in Scope

    contracts
    OpenfabricToken.sol - contracts/OpenfabricToken.sol

    Disclaimer