Q2 2026 Security & Compliance Report67 incidents, $764M in losses, 88% from operational failures.
Get the report →

Audit name:

[dApp] Sentience | dApp | Feb2024

Date:

Apr 2, 2024

Table of Content

→Introduction
→Audit Summary
→Document Information
→System Overview
→Executive Summary
→Findings
→Appendix 1. Severity Definitions
→Appendix 2. Scope

Want a comprehensive audit report like this?

Introduction

We express our gratitude to the SophiaVerse team for the collaborative engagement that enabled the execution of this Security Assessment.

titlecontent
PlatformMobile Application, Browser Extantion
LanguageJavascript / Typescript
Timeline07/02/2024 - 11/03/2024
Methodologyhttps://hackenio.cc/dApp_methodology→

    Audit Summary

    Total10/10
    Security Score

    10/10

    Test Coverage

    100%

    Code Quality Score

    10/10

    Documentation Quality Score

    10/10

    3Total Findings
    3Resolved
    0Accepted
    0Mitigated

    The system users should acknowledge all the risks summed up in the risks section of the report

    Document Information

    This report may contain confidential information about IT systems and the intellectual property of the Customer, as well as information about potential vulnerabilities and methods of their exploitation.

    The report can be disclosed publicly after prior consent by another Party. Any subsequent publication of this report shall be without mandatory consent.

    Document

    NameDecentralized Application (dApp) Code Review and Security Analysis Report for SophiaVerse
    Audited ByEce Orsel
    Approved ByStephen Ajayi
    Websitehttps://hacken.io→
    Changelog30/01/2024 - Preliminary Report
    • Document

      Name
      Decentralized Application (dApp) Code Review and Security Analysis Report for SophiaVerse
      Audited By
      Ece Orsel
      Approved By
      Stephen Ajayi
      Changelog
      30/01/2024 - Preliminary Report

    System Overview

    The SENTIENT Metamask Snap Project is centered on creating a streamlined and effective add-on for the Metamask digital currency wallet. The goal of this initiative is to improve the user interface and offer extra features within the Metamask environment by utilizing an uncomplicated but potent snap

    Executive Summary

    Documentation quality

    The total Documentation Quality score is 10 out of 10.

    Code quality

    The total Code Quality score is 10 out of 10.

    • Structured Layout: The code is organized logically and systematically.

    • Uniform Coding Practices: The code adheres to a consistent style, improving its legibility.

    Security score

    Upon auditing, the code was found to contain 0 critical, 0 high, 0 medium, and 2 low severity issues, leading to a security score of 10 out of 10.

    All identified issues are detailed in the “Findings” section of this report.

    Summary

    The comprehensive audit of the customer's dapp yields an overall score of 9. This score reflects the combined evaluation of documentation, code quality, test coverage, and security aspects of the project.

    Findings

    F-2024-1366Insecure Handling of User Inputs in Token Swapping Functionality
    Status
    fixed
    Severity

    Low
    F-2024-1359Lack of Range Control for Slippage Value
    Status
    fixed
    Severity

    Low
    F-2024-1370Untrusted Token Information
    Status
    fixed
    Severity

    Observation
    Code
    ―
    Title
    Status
    Severity
    F-2024-1366Insecure Handling of User Inputs in Token Swapping Functionality
    fixed

    Low
    F-2024-1359Lack of Range Control for Slippage Value
    fixed

    Low
    F-2024-1370Untrusted Token Information
    fixed

    Observation
    1-3 of 3 findings

    Protect your dApp with insights like these.

    Appendix 1. Severity Definitions

    Severity

    Description

    Critical
    These issues present a major security vulnerability that poses a severe risk to the system. They require immediate attention and must be resolved to prevent a potential security breach or other significant harm.

    High
    These issues present a significant risk to the system, but may not require immediate attention. They should be addressed in a timely manner to reduce the risk of the potential security breach.

    Medium
    These issues present a moderate risk to the system and cannot have a great impact on its function. They should be addressed in a reasonable time frame, but may not require immediate attention.

    Low
    These issues present no risk to the system and typically relate to the code quality problems or general recommendations. They do not require immediate attention and should be viewed as a minor recommendation.
    • Severity

      Critical

      Description

      These issues present a major security vulnerability that poses a severe risk to the system. They require immediate attention and must be resolved to prevent a potential security breach or other significant harm.

      Severity

      High

      Description

      These issues present a significant risk to the system, but may not require immediate attention. They should be addressed in a timely manner to reduce the risk of the potential security breach.

      Severity

      Medium

      Description

      These issues present a moderate risk to the system and cannot have a great impact on its function. They should be addressed in a reasonable time frame, but may not require immediate attention.

      Severity

      Low

      Description

      These issues present no risk to the system and typically relate to the code quality problems or general recommendations. They do not require immediate attention and should be viewed as a minor recommendation.

    Appendix 2. Scope

    The scope of the project includes the following endpoints from the provided repository: