Q2 2026 Security & Compliance Report67 incidents, $764M in losses, 88% from operational failures.
Get the report →

Audit name:

[SCA] Kenshi | ERC20 | Jun2023

Date:

Jun 19, 2023

Table of Content

→Introduction
→Audit Summary
→Document Information
→System Overview
→Executive Summary
→Findings
→Appendix 1. Severity Definitions
→Appendix 2. Scope
→Disclaimer

Want a comprehensive audit report like this?

Introduction

We express our gratitude to the Kenshi team for the collaborative engagement that enabled the execution of this Smart Contract Security Assessment.

Kenshi is a pioneering blockchain technology company headquartered in the heart of Switzerland, with a commitment to innovation and excellence.

titlecontent
PlatformEVM
LanguageSolidity
TagsERC20
Timeline01/06/2023 - 20/06/2023
Methodologyhttps://hackenio.cc/sc_methodology→

    Review Scope

    Repositoryhttps://github.com/KenshiTech/contracts→
    Commit37bb1dc

    Audit Summary

    Total8/10
    Security Score

    10/10

    Test Coverage

    100.0%

    Code Quality Score

    10/10

    Documentation Quality Score

    10/10

    5Total Findings
    5Resolved
    0Accepted
    0Mitigated

    The system users should acknowledge all the risks summed up in the risks section of the report

    Document Information

    This report may contain confidential information about IT systems and the intellectual property of the Customer, as well as information about potential vulnerabilities and methods of their exploitation.

    The report can be disclosed publicly after prior consent by another Party. Any subsequent publication of this report shall be without mandatory consent.

    Document

    NameSmart Contract Code Review and Security Analysis Report for Kenshi
    Audited ByHacken
    Websitehttps://kenshi.io→
    Changelog08/06/2023 - Initial Review
    09/06/2023 - Second Review
    20/06/2023 - Third Review
    • Document

      Name
      Smart Contract Code Review and Security Analysis Report for Kenshi
      Audited By
      Hacken
      Changelog
      08/06/2023 - Initial Review
      09/06/2023 - Second Review
      20/06/2023 - Third Review

    System Overview

    KENSHI is simple system with popular token implementation with the following contracts:

    • ERC20 — is a basic implementation of the ERC20 protocol. It includes an ownable feature, which allows for a recovery mechanism for tokens that are accidentally sent to the contract address. Only the owner of the contract can retrieve these tokens to prevent unauthorized access.

    Privileged roles

    • ERC20.sol:

      • Contract Owner:

        • Can send ERC20 tokens from the contract balance.

    Executive Summary

    Documentation quality

    The total Documentation quality score is 10 out of 10.

    • Functional requirements are detailed:

      • Project overview is detailed.

      • All roles in the system are described.

      • Use cases are described and detailed.

    • Technical description is robust:

      • Run instructions are provided.

      • Technical specification is provided.

      • NatSpec is sufficient.

    Code quality

    The total Code quality score is 10 out of 10.

    • Code contains no quality violations.

    Test coverage

    Code coverage of the project is 100.0% (branch coverage).

    • Deployment and basic user interactions are covered with tests.

    • Negative cases coverage is present.

    • Interactions with several users are tested.

    Security score

    Upon auditing, the code was found to contain 0 critical, 0 high, 0 medium, and 3 low severity issues. Out of these, 3 issues have been addressed and resolved, leading to a Security score of 10 out of 10.

    All identified issues are detailed in the “Findings” section of this report.

    Summary

    The comprehensive audit of the customer's smart contract yields an overall score of 10. This score reflects the combined evaluation of documentation, code quality, test coverage, and security aspects of the project.

    Findings

    F-2023-0177Unchecked Transfer
    Status
    fixed
    Severity

    Low
    F-2023-0176Redundant Function
    Status
    fixed
    Severity

    Low
    F-2023-0175Copy Of Well Known Contracts
    Status
    fixed
    Severity

    Low
    I-2023-0059Function That Can Be Declared External
    Status
    fixed
    Severity

    Observation
    I-2023-0058Style Guide Violation
    Status
    fixed
    Severity

    Observation
    Code
    ―
    Title
    Status
    Severity
    F-2023-0177Unchecked Transfer
    fixed

    Low
    F-2023-0176Redundant Function
    fixed

    Low
    F-2023-0175Copy Of Well Known Contracts
    fixed

    Low
    I-2023-0059Function That Can Be Declared External
    fixed

    Observation
    I-2023-0058Style Guide Violation
    fixed

    Observation
    1-5 of 5 findings

    Identify vulnerabilities in your smart contracts.

    Appendix 1. Severity Definitions

    When auditing smart contracts, Hacken is using a risk-based approach that considers Likelihood, Impact, Exploitability and Complexity metrics to evaluate findings and score severities.

    Reference on how risk scoring is done is available through the repository in our Github organization:

    Severity

    Description

    Critical
    Critical vulnerabilities are usually straightforward to exploit and can lead to the loss of user funds or contract state manipulation.

    High
    High vulnerabilities are usually harder to exploit, requiring specific conditions, or have a more limited scope, but can still lead to the loss of user funds or contract state manipulation.

    Medium
    Medium vulnerabilities are usually limited to state manipulations and, in most cases, cannot lead to asset loss. Contradictions and requirements violations. Major deviations from best practices are also in this category.

    Low
    Major deviations from best practices or major Gas inefficiency. These issues will not have a significant impact on code execution, do not affect security score but can affect code quality score.
    • Severity

      Critical

      Description

      Critical vulnerabilities are usually straightforward to exploit and can lead to the loss of user funds or contract state manipulation.

      Severity

      High

      Description

      High vulnerabilities are usually harder to exploit, requiring specific conditions, or have a more limited scope, but can still lead to the loss of user funds or contract state manipulation.

      Severity

      Medium

      Description

      Medium vulnerabilities are usually limited to state manipulations and, in most cases, cannot lead to asset loss. Contradictions and requirements violations. Major deviations from best practices are also in this category.

      Severity

      Low

      Description

      Major deviations from best practices or major Gas inefficiency. These issues will not have a significant impact on code execution, do not affect security score but can affect code quality score.

    Appendix 2. Scope

    The scope of the project includes the following smart contracts from the provided repository:

    Scope Details

    Repositoryhttps://github.com/KenshiTech/contracts→
    Commit37bb1dc
    WhitepaperProvided→
    RequirementsProvided→
    Technical RequirementsProvided→

    Contracts in Scope

    contracts
    ERC20.sol - contracts › ERC20.sol

    Disclaimer