Q2 2026 Security & Compliance Report67 incidents, $764M in losses, 88% from operational failures.
Get the report →

Audit name:

[SCA] DeXe | Token sales | Sep2020

Date:

Sep 23, 2020

Table of Content

→Introduction
→Audit Summary
→System Overview
→Findings
→Appendix 1. Severity Definitions
→Appendix 2. Scope
→Disclaimer

Want a comprehensive audit report like this?

Introduction

We express our gratitude to the DeXe Network team for the collaborative engagement that enabled the execution of this Smart Contract Security Assessment.

DeXe Network is a platform for Defi asset management.

Document

NameSmart Contract Code Review and Security Analysis Report for DeXe Network
Audited ByHacken
Changelog20/09/2020 - Initial Audit
24/09/2020 - Second Review
PlatformEVM
LanguageSolidity
TagsToken, Token-sales, Staking
Methodologyhttps://hackenio.cc/sc_methodology→
  • Document

    Name
    Smart Contract Code Review and Security Analysis Report for DeXe Network
    Audited By
    Hacken
    Changelog
    20/09/2020 - Initial Audit
    24/09/2020 - Second Review
    Platform
    EVM
    Language
    Solidity
    Tags
    Token, Token-sales, Staking

Review Scope

Audit Archive Filedexe-8ca55a54680edb118108384318f1867caf65565b.zip
SHA256 Checksumc3b6df51f4b88bc7f518c425786a518548d89052153a65310058f7f74057ff18
  • Review Scope

    Audit Archive File
    dexe-8ca55a54680edb118108384318f1867caf65565b.zip
    SHA256 Checksum
    c3b6df51f4b88bc7f518c425786a518548d89052153a65310058f7f74057ff18

Audit Summary

2Total Findings
2Resolved
0Accepted
0Mitigated

The system users should acknowledge all the risks summed up in the risks section of the report

System Overview

Conclusion

Smart contracts within the scope was manually reviewed and analyzed with static analysis tools. For the contract high level description of functionality was presented in As-is overview section of the report.

Audit report contains all found security vulnerabilities and other issues in the reviewed code.

Security engineers found 1 medium and 1 low severity issue during the initial audit. All the issues have been fixed before the secondary audit.

The code is well-tested and works as described in the whitepaper.

Findings

F-2020-1920Improper Limit
Status
fixed
Severity

Medium
F-2020-1921Unused Field
Status
fixed
Severity

Low
Code
―
Title
Status
Severity
F-2020-1920Improper Limit
fixed

Medium
F-2020-1921Unused Field
fixed

Low
1-2 of 2 findings

Identify vulnerabilities in your smart contracts.

Appendix 1. Severity Definitions

When auditing smart contracts, Hacken is using a risk-based approach that considers Likelihood, Impact, Exploitability and Complexity metrics to evaluate findings and score severities.

Reference on how risk scoring is done is available through the repository in our Github organization:

Severity

Description

Critical
Critical vulnerabilities are usually straightforward to exploit and can lead to the loss of user funds or contract state manipulation.

High
High vulnerabilities are usually harder to exploit, requiring specific conditions, or have a more limited scope, but can still lead to the loss of user funds or contract state manipulation.

Medium
Medium vulnerabilities are usually limited to state manipulations and, in most cases, cannot lead to asset loss. Contradictions and requirements violations. Major deviations from best practices are also in this category.

Low
Major deviations from best practices or major Gas inefficiency. These issues will not have a significant impact on code execution, do not affect security score but can affect code quality score.
  • Severity

    Critical

    Description

    Critical vulnerabilities are usually straightforward to exploit and can lead to the loss of user funds or contract state manipulation.

    Severity

    High

    Description

    High vulnerabilities are usually harder to exploit, requiring specific conditions, or have a more limited scope, but can still lead to the loss of user funds or contract state manipulation.

    Severity

    Medium

    Description

    Medium vulnerabilities are usually limited to state manipulations and, in most cases, cannot lead to asset loss. Contradictions and requirements violations. Major deviations from best practices are also in this category.

    Severity

    Low

    Description

    Major deviations from best practices or major Gas inefficiency. These issues will not have a significant impact on code execution, do not affect security score but can affect code quality score.

Appendix 2. Scope

The scope of the project includes the following smart contracts from the provided repository:

Scope Details

Archive Namedexe-8ca55a54680edb118108384318f1867caf65565b.zip
SHA256 Checksumc3b6df51f4b88bc7f518c425786a518548d89052153a65310058f7f74057ff18
WhitepaperNot provided
RequirementsNot provided
Technical RequirementsNot provided
  • Scope Details

    Archive Name
    dexe-8ca55a54680edb118108384318f1867caf65565b.zip
    SHA256 Checksum
    c3b6df51f4b88bc7f518c425786a518548d89052153a65310058f7f74057ff18
    Whitepaper
    Not provided
    Requirements
    Not provided
    Technical Requirements
    Not provided

Disclaimer