Q2 2026 Security & Compliance Report67 incidents, $764M in losses, 88% from operational failures.
Get the report →

Audit name:

[SCA] Vapor Wallet | Token | Dec2023

Date:

Dec 27, 2023

Table of Content

→Introduction
→Audit Summary
→Document Information
→System Overview
→Executive Summary
→Risks
→Findings
→Appendix 1. Severity Definitions
→Appendix 2. Scope
→Disclaimer

Want a comprehensive audit report like this?

Introduction

We thank Decubate for allowing us to conduct a Smart Contract Security Assessment. This document outlines our methodology, limitations, and results of the security assessment.

Vapor Wallet aims to empower users to seamlessly transition into the realm of decentralized finance (DeFi) and cryptocurrencies while minimizing gas fee complexities.

titlecontent
PlatformEVM
LanguageSolidity
TagsERC20
Timeline11.12.2023 - 13.12.2023
Methodologyhttps://hackenio.cc/sc_methodology→

    Audit Summary

    Total10/10
    Security Score

    10/10

    Test Coverage

    100%

    Code Quality Score

    10/10

    Documentation Quality Score

    10/10

    0Total Findings
    0Resolved
    0Accepted
    0Mitigated

    The system users should acknowledge all the risks summed up in the risks section of the report

    Document Information

    This report may contain confidential information about IT systems and the intellectual property of the Customer, as well as information about potential vulnerabilities and methods of their exploitation.

    The report can be disclosed publicly after prior consent by another Party. Any subsequent publication of this report shall be without mandatory consent.

    Document

    NameSmart Contract Code Review and Security Analysis Report for Decubate
    Audited ByViktor Raboshchuk - SC Auditor at Hacken OÜ
    Approved ByYves Toiser - SC Lead Auditor at Hacken OÜ
    Websitehttps://www.vaporwallet.co/→
    Changelog13/12/2023 - Preliminary Report
    • Document

      Name
      Smart Contract Code Review and Security Analysis Report for Decubate
      Audited By
      Viktor Raboshchuk - SC Auditor at Hacken OÜ
      Approved By
      Yves Toiser - SC Lead Auditor at Hacken OÜ
      Changelog
      13/12/2023 - Preliminary Report

    System Overview

    Vapor Wallet is a token with the following contracts:

    VPRToken  — is a simple ERC-20 token that mints the entire initial supply to a deployer. Additional minting is not allowed.

    It has the following attributes:

    • Name: Vapor Token

    • Symbol: VPR

    • Decimals: 18

    • Total supply: 1 billion tokens.

    Privileged roles

    • No privileged roles.

    Executive Summary

    Documentation quality

    The total Documentation Quality score is 10 out of 10.

    • Functional requirements are present:

      • Tokenomic description is provided.

    • Technical description is provided:

      • NatSpec is sufficient.

    Code quality

    The total Code Quality score is 10 out of 10

    • The development environment is configured.

    Test coverage

    Code coverage of the project is 0% .

    • Tests are not provided (according to our methodology, tests are not mandatory for projects smaller than 250 lines of codes).

    Security score

    Upon auditing, the code was found to contain 0 critical, 0 high, 0 medium, and 0 low severity issues, leading to a security score of 10 out of 10.

    All identified issues are detailed in the “Findings” section of this report.

    Summary

    The comprehensive audit of the customer's smart contract yields an overall score of 10. This score reflects the combined evaluation of documentation, code quality, test coverage, and security aspects of the project.

    Risks

    All tokens are minted to a single address. The secureness of the supply depends on the secureness of key storage.

    Findings

    no findingsNo vulnerabilities were found

    Identify vulnerabilities in your smart contracts.

    Appendix 1. Severity Definitions

    When auditing smart contracts Hacken is using a risk-based approach that considers the potential impact of any vulnerabilities and the likelihood of them being exploited. The matrix of impact and likelihood is a commonly used tool in risk management to help assess and prioritize risks.

    The impact of a vulnerability refers to the potential harm that could result if it were to be exploited. For smart contracts, this could include the loss of funds or assets, unauthorized access or control, or reputational damage.

    The likelihood of a vulnerability being exploited is determined by considering the likelihood of an attack occurring, the level of skill or resources required to exploit the vulnerability, and the presence of any mitigating controls that could reduce the likelihood of exploitation.

    Severity

    Description

    Critical
    Critical vulnerabilities are usually straightforward to exploit and can lead to the loss of user funds or contract state manipulation.

    High
    High vulnerabilities are usually harder to exploit, requiring specific conditions, or have a more limited scope, but can still lead to the loss of user funds or contract state manipulation.

    Medium
    Medium vulnerabilities are usually limited to state manipulations and, in most cases, cannot lead to asset loss. Contradictions and requirements violations. Major deviations from best practices are also in this category.

    Low
    Major deviations from best practices or major Gas inefficiency. These issues will not have a significant impact on code execution, do not affect security score but can affect code quality score.
    • Severity

      Critical

      Description

      Critical vulnerabilities are usually straightforward to exploit and can lead to the loss of user funds or contract state manipulation.

      Severity

      High

      Description

      High vulnerabilities are usually harder to exploit, requiring specific conditions, or have a more limited scope, but can still lead to the loss of user funds or contract state manipulation.

      Severity

      Medium

      Description

      Medium vulnerabilities are usually limited to state manipulations and, in most cases, cannot lead to asset loss. Contradictions and requirements violations. Major deviations from best practices are also in this category.

      Severity

      Low

      Description

      Major deviations from best practices or major Gas inefficiency. These issues will not have a significant impact on code execution, do not affect security score but can affect code quality score.

    Appendix 2. Scope

    The scope of the project includes the following smart contracts from the provided repository:

    Scope Details

    Repositoryhttps://github.com/Decubate-com/smart-contracts→
    Commite98d79c7c734fb26bb3248783b1baf2c917282b9
    Whitepaper-
    Requirementshttps://medium.com/@VaporWallet/introducing-vpr-unlocking-the-power-of-vapor-token-43ed76520c0c→
    Technical Requirements-

    Contracts in Scope

    contracts
    VPRToken.sol - contracts › VPRToken.sol

    Disclaimer