Q1 2026 Security & Compliance Report44 incidents, $482M in losses, insights from 11 industry leaders.
Read the report

Audit name:

[SCA] Cofinex | Cofinex-Contracts | Aug2025

Date:

Aug 22, 2025

Table of Content

Introduction
Audit Summary
System Overview
Potential Risks
Findings
Appendix 1. Definitions
Appendix 2. Scope
Appendix 3. Additional Valuables
Disclaimer

Want a comprehensive audit report like this?

Introduction

We express our gratitude to the Cofinex team for the collaborative engagement that enabled the execution of this Smart Contract Security Assessment.

Cofinex is a global digital asset and cryptocurrency exchange platform.

Document

NameSmart Contract Code Review and Security Analysis Report for Cofinex
Audited ByViktor Lavrenenko
Approved ByIvan Bondar
Websitehttp://cofinex.io/
Changelog20/08/2025 - Preliminary Report
22/08/2025 - Final Report
PlatformBSC
LanguageSolidity
TagsERC20; Pausable; Burnable; Permit
Methodologyhttps://hackenio.cc/sc_methodology
  • Document

    Name
    Smart Contract Code Review and Security Analysis Report for Cofinex
    Audited By
    Viktor Lavrenenko
    Approved By
    Ivan Bondar
    Changelog
    20/08/2025 - Preliminary Report
    22/08/2025 - Final Report
    Platform
    BSC
    Language
    Solidity
    Tags
    ERC20; Pausable; Burnable; Permit

Audit Summary

1Total Findings
0Resolved
0Accepted
1Mitigated

The system users should acknowledge all the risks summed up in the risks section of the report

Documentation quality

  • Functional requirements are complete:

    • The project’s purpose is described.

    • Business logic is provided.

    • Use cases are provided.

    • Project’s features are explained.

  • Technical description is complete:

    • Key function descriptions are provided for the files in the scope.

    • Roles and authorization are described.

    • Information on used technologies is provided.

Code quality

  • Best practices are followed.

  • The development environment is configured.

Test coverage

Code coverage of the project is 100% (branch coverage):

  • Deployment and basic user interactions are covered with tests.

  • Negative cases coverage is provided.

  • Interactions by several users are tested thoroughly.

System Overview

CNX.sol  — Burnable and Pausable ERC-20 token with permit functionality that mints all initial supply to a deployer. Additional minting is not allowed.

It has the following attributes:

  • Name: Cofinex.

  • Symbol: CNX.

  • Decimals: 18.

  • Total supply: 500000000 * 10**18.

Privileged roles

  • The owner of the Cofinex smart-contract can:

    • pause and unpause the token functionality via the pause()/unpause() functions.

    • transfer the contract ownership via the transferOwnership() function.

Potential Risks

The project concentrates minting tokens in a single address, raising the risk of fund mismanagement or theft, especially if key storage security is compromised.

The Cofinex token contract is pausable meaning that the contract owner can pause the token's functionality at any time.

Findings

Code
Title
Status
Severity
F-2025-1229 Potential Loss of Ownership Control in Contract Using Ownable
mitigated

Observation
1-1 of 1 findings

Identify vulnerabilities in your smart contracts.

Appendix 1. Definitions

Severities

When auditing smart contracts, Hacken is using a risk-based approach that considers Likelihood, Impact, Exploitability and Complexity metrics to evaluate findings and score severities.

Reference on how risk scoring is done is available through the repository in our Github organization:

Severity

Description

Critical
Critical vulnerabilities are usually straightforward to exploit and can lead to the loss of user funds or contract state manipulation.

High
High vulnerabilities are usually harder to exploit, requiring specific conditions, or have a more limited scope, but can still lead to the loss of user funds or contract state manipulation.

Medium
Medium vulnerabilities are usually limited to state manipulations and, in most cases, cannot lead to asset loss. Contradictions and requirements violations. Major deviations from best practices are also in this category.

Low
Major deviations from best practices or major Gas inefficiency. These issues will not have a significant impact on code execution.
  • Severity

    Critical

    Description

    Critical vulnerabilities are usually straightforward to exploit and can lead to the loss of user funds or contract state manipulation.

    Severity

    High

    Description

    High vulnerabilities are usually harder to exploit, requiring specific conditions, or have a more limited scope, but can still lead to the loss of user funds or contract state manipulation.

    Severity

    Medium

    Description

    Medium vulnerabilities are usually limited to state manipulations and, in most cases, cannot lead to asset loss. Contradictions and requirements violations. Major deviations from best practices are also in this category.

    Severity

    Low

    Description

    Major deviations from best practices or major Gas inefficiency. These issues will not have a significant impact on code execution.

Potential Risks

The "Potential Risks" section identifies issues that are not direct security vulnerabilities but could still affect the project’s performance, reliability, or user trust. These risks arise from design choices, architectural decisions, or operational practices that, while not immediately exploitable, may lead to problems under certain conditions. Additionally, potential risks can impact the quality of the audit itself, as they may involve external factors or components beyond the scope of the audit, leading to incomplete assessments or oversight of key areas. This section aims to provide a broader perspective on factors that could affect the project's long-term security, functionality, and the comprehensiveness of the audit findings.

Appendix 2. Scope

The scope of the project includes the following smart contracts from the provided repository:

Assets in Scope

.
CNX.sol - . › CNX.sol

Appendix 3. Additional Valuables

The smart contracts in the scope of this audit could benefit from the introduction of automatic emergency actions for critical activities, such as unauthorized operations like ownership changes or proxy upgrades, as well as unexpected fund manipulations, including large withdrawals or minting events. Adding such mechanisms would enable the protocol to react automatically to unusual activity, ensuring that the contract remains secure and functions as intended.

To improve functionality, these emergency actions could be designed to trigger under specific conditions, such as:

  • Detecting changes to ownership or critical permissions.

  • Monitoring large or unexpected transactions and minting events.

  • Pausing operations when irregularities are identified.

These enhancements would provide an added layer of security, making the contract more robust and better equipped to handle unexpected situations while maintaining smooth operations.

Disclaimer